Preloved
ClassifiedsForumsReviewsMembersThe Joy of Second Hand

Honda SLR650 Review

Overall Ratings

***** *****
***** *****
Overall
*****

Based upon average ratings provided by 18 members - add your own review

Showing reviews 1 to 14 of 14.


NEILM
Reviewed April 2004.

Performance Reliability
- -
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
- -

Centre-stand for SLR 650 ? - not sure, but I had a "Rickey Products" one from M&P for my NX650 S Dominator (95 model). It's fit was "universal" in that it didn't fit an exact position. It was held on by U-bolts (pretty flimsy ones at that) which clamped up around the two side rails under the engine. Having said that, i'd used it for over 5 years & it was still solid when I sold the bike. Paint (black) was good & thick. Not cheap at £60 though. It would probably fit the SLR.
Mono-shock for SLR ? - I'd guess even harder to come by than one for my 95 Dominator. Honda wanted £600 for an original replacement !!. Gees...it was good....but not that good!.
Hagon couldn't do a shock for the 95 model at that time.
A Glasgow firm, - Caledonia Engineering (advertise in M.C.N.) re-build my original shock with a new damper rod, oil & gas (I opted to retain original spring)for £125. They even hand delivered it to me (in Fife), with a 2 year guarantee. It lasted that long before feeling soft (but not leaking) again. Could be worth a try.

-
Never owned

pc
Reviewed March 2004.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

Can anyone tell me if they have opted for the supermoto look with there slr? I have seen a few on the net but there isn't any info of where you can get different wheels etc.

*****
Never owned

edgar
Reviewed March 2004.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

One correspondent (Taz) said he had fitted a larger tank to his SLR650, anyone know where I can get [Log in to view email]

*****
Owned for more than 5 years.

Taz
Reviewed March 2004.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

I love my SLR it is brilliant for getting to & from work and it is torquie enough to have fun on, like sliding the back end out;) I changed the tank on mine to a 22Lt that I got from Hien Gerrick Magazine and have now raised the front end put a set of high bars on it and a high front mudguard so its now looking like a complete hooligans play thing the only downside to owning the SLR is trying to get parts for it, so if anyone knows where I can get a new Mono-Shock pleas let me know.

*****
Owned for 4 years.

Clive
Reviewed February 2004.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

Mines a 98 (S) with 5600 miles. Paid £1000 in Feb 2004.
Good points.
Excellent commuter, cheap to run on fuel/insurance. reliable
Bad Points.
No protection from weather in a high riding position, Throttle is a bit 'on/off' at lower speeds, no centre stand.

*****
Owned for 1 month.



kenny
Reviewed January 2003.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

for the money you can hardly complain. I use an slr to get around dublin and it works well in the crowded city. The big single has ample torque to drag race the motorcycle couriers at the lights. If you are looking for a machine to do any motorway or distance work, keep looking. The upright position turns you into a human sail. Its uncomfortable and saps all the power. It is great on the b roads and is more fun in the country. I have had one for a few years now and have had no problems yet. The finish is starting to get rough with winter time but there is no bike I know of that can resist road salt. Keep the battery well charged and it will start every frosty morning. I am getting another bike for distance work but am keeping the slr for dublin city center work.
try one there cheap and cheerful.
kenny

*****
Owned for 3 years.

mroeb
Reviewed August 2002.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

I was going to Morocco and didn't want a second hand bike, so I bought an SLR650 as it was the cheapest new 650 I could find (£3200).

On that trip, in comparison to my mates Tenere it had abysmal tank range, a terrible seat (I bungeed my camping pillow on there in the end)and no wind protection.

However I would not have swopped over; on the dirt roads it was just as good as the Tenere and on the road 10 mph faster at the top end, plus it is a damn site more confidence inspiring in the corners.

Back in London, the bike has excellent steering lock, is narrow, is totally undesirable, and is fast up to 60; about the perfect combination.


*****
Owned for 3 years.

huskybloke
Reviewed May 2002.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

A much maligned bike. Good at the traffic light grand Prix, Good on the twisty back lanes , good visability in traffic, poor styling and absolutely zero street cred.

*****
Owned for 3 years.

A Friend
Reviewed December 2000.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

Road Test by Tim Pestridge - Honda SLR
650 supplied by Bridge Motorcycles,
Exeter

Manufacturers have long been removing
bits from their model range
to create a 'brand new' model.
Introduced in 1997, Honda's SLR650
is simply a no-frills Honda Dominator
with most of the pretty bits
missing. To further save money the SLR
is assembled in Spain, and
aimed squarely at the European budget
fun bike market. Although this model
was tested only 3 years ago by the
editor, I was keen to discover how
nearly 6000 miles and 3 years have
affected this budget 'bitsa' bike.

Bridge Motorcycles have this
delightfully coloured model for sale
at their Exeter branch
(http://www.bridgemotorcycles.co.uk) along
with a whole range of very shiny used
machines. Much to my surprise the
SLR looked near immaculate, no real
signs of wear anywhere, and
I was drawn to it's simple clean
design. As you should expect of
such a new bike, it has a full service
history, and was competitively priced
at £2299. Climbing onto the saddle of
the SLR from my own VFR750, I found the
narrowness of the bike quite a
surprise, and it certainly doesn't have
any of the physical presence you'd
imagine
from a thumping great 650 single. So
slim is the tank that your knees feel
as if they're almost pressed together,
and the overall dimensions are little
more than a 125 trail bike.

Running it over my 30 mile commute
proved how much more entertaining
the fun-loving 'go-anywhere' SLR is
compared to more 'serious' machines.
The re-tuned Dominator motor is packed
with punch, and I guarantee
it will shock you just how quickly it
storms to 60mph. The big piston
thrives on revs, and positively
encourages you to keep on twisting
that throttle - and smile.

As Peter remarked in the launch test,
this is a great bike for cutting
through the traffic. Honestly,
it's a doddle to ride, responsive and
easy to throw around at low
traffic speeds, and gives you much more
confidence in traffic than a faired
machine.

The SLR takes tiny mud strewn roads in
it's stride; filtering past
cars and traffic light grand prix's are
all SLR territory, but beware,
big roads and motorways are definitely
out. Unless you're blessed
with a strong tailwind, the sit-up-and-
beg riding position that's
so good for looking over tall country
hedges turns you into a human
sail above seventy mph. But what about
the off road styling?
The
SLR like most off-road vehicles will
spend 99% of its life on-road,
but I suspect many owners would be
pleasantly surprised with it's
easy off-road manners. The half-worn
Dunlops are a good compromise,
allowing me to have a bit of fun on
some rocky tracks, and wheelspin
over slimey drain covers without worry.
So who exactly would want a budget 650
single? Well, I suspect not
as many as Honda would have liked, as
ironically they've now put
a nose fairing back on it, put back
some bigger shinier bits on
it and called it a Vindicator. But as a
fun commuter it's a real
tonic. You'll not find a torquier town
bike than this for a shade
over two grand.

If you're back-lane/city commute has
turned into a bore, try it on an SLR -
I guarantee it'll put the smile back on
your face.


Tech bit

Economy worked out as around 49mpg,
which I consider passable. Tyre
life should reach 7-10,000 with care,
and no plastics or complex
workings means overall running costs
will be low. Brakes are superb, with
great control.

NB. December 2000 - SLR's are now in
dealers at under £2000, and private
buyers are selling them for as little
as £1500.00. This makes them well worth
considering as a 2nd / fun bike.


*****
Never owned
http://www.pestridge.com/slr65.....html

Bike Net
Reviewed March 2000.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

Honda's publicity material hints that the SLR650 is an attempt to join in the 'Super Motaard' (sic) trend within Europe. Super Motards are created by taking and essentially off-road bike like a big Husky motocrosser and putting road wheels and tyres on the thing to mimic the "real" race bikes in the off/on road race series so popular in France and Germany. So you get your KTM or similar, put on 17 inch rims (as wide as you can get) with Hi-sports or similar sticky rubber, and then broadside round the nearest roundabout fully decked out in leathers with motocross boots.

With Honda, however, the concept has lost something in the translation - so instead of a rip-snorting XR with 17 inch rims and indicators, they've taken a street bike (the Dominator) as a basis (a fine bike, by all accounts) and taken bits off it until you end up with the machine here. Unfortunately during the work they seemed to have got a bit confused, 'cos they didn't go with 17 inch rims (19 incher up front in place of the Dominator's 21) and they insisted on keeping trail tyres (Dunlop Trailmax) instead of road rubber. Then they added a strange chrome crashbar and a rack, and big black plastic sidepanels and alloy footrest hangers.

So what have we ended up with?

Looking round the SLR things seemed awfully familiar... of a late 70s/early 80s trail bike, actually. A black-painted steel cradle frame (with box sections) holds the RFVC single-cylinder engine, and acts as an oil reservoir too. The swinging arm is box-section steel (wot no alloy?) and the footrests are hanging from a humungous lump of alloy which competes with the Triumph Trophy for the title of Biggest Footrest Brackets in Biking. Up front the 19 inch wheel (laced with very nice alloy rim) sported Dunlop dual-purpose Trailmax tyres and braked by a Brembo disk and calliper, which looks like a gold jobby but turns out to be a sliding type (though it's sufficient for the bike anyway). This is evidence of the tie-up between Honda and Italy, started with the production of the NSR125, and continued with the SLR.

The real retro bit is the headlamp, mudguard and clocks, which bring back fond memories of late 70s XL and TL trail bikes. The mudguard could have come straight from the TL250, while the headlamp is held into its shell with cross-head screws just like my 1979 XL185 - we didn't look, but what's the betting the headlamp shell contains a bird's nest of wiring just like the XL (once opened, never repacked correctly)?

The bars are pretty low and narrow for a "trail" bike, and the seat height is lower than your average trailie, though it's still quite a bit higher than a conventional road bike. The seat's pretty hard, but once aboard all the controls are familiar, including electric start, push-to-cancel indicators and handlebar mounted choke (OK, so it's the 90s after all).

On the Street
Grinding on the starter motor, the engine reluctantly fired up (glad it's not a kicker!) with a quiet putter. The bike seems particularly cold-blooded; on cold mornings it took several minutes (or miles) of running before the choke could be eased off - too early, and the bike would stall when halting at traffic junctions.

Once warmed up, the carburation was fairly clean, if not astonishing. Winding the throttle open eventually gained an increase in speed, but there's a distinct impression that the engine is being strangled - there's neither the low-down grunt or mid range that you would expect from a big single, and I found I was changing gear more often than I would expect, just to get a bit more urgency into things. If I owned the bike I'd be sorely tempted to put on a lighter tuned pipe (say from an XR) and get the carburation beefed up to suit.

Handling and Suspension
Putting long travel suspension on a road bike is a good idea in London - the road surface is atrocious, with potholes up to 6 inches deep on many city roads making a trailie ideally suited for the regular commuter routine. The SLRs suspension certainly handle the bumps better than a sports bike, but it's clear that they've been built to a price, lacking in damping at both ends, and giving a slightly harsh ride. It's also too soft for bend swinging, giving the bike a vague feel and not passing enough feedback to the rider.

The steering geometry doesn't appear to have been modified from the Dominator's, and combined with the 19 inch front wheel means the bike steers very quickly - a little too quickly, to be truthful. This is not really a bike for the inexperienced road rider in bad weather, as the fast steering, lack of grip from the tyres (they're not full road rubber, remember) and harsh suspension didn't feel very reassuring, nor inspire confidence when cornering.

On faster stretches the SLR accelerated to 70mph easily - above that the lack of fairing made hanging on hard work (especially in the cold) , but on a good day it should top 90mph. The front brake worked well enough, though the tyres and dive from the front forks ultimately determined braking distance more than the brake itself.

At the back a heavy boot could easily overpower the rear tyre, and in fact that was one of the few fun bits about the bike - hare up to a junction, stand on the rear brake and watch the faces turn as you broadside up to the mark with a screech...

Honda claim that the bike is 99% on-road, 1% off, so we took it onto the dirt. And fell off it.

The bars are too low for motocross-style riding, though you can get away with some slow trials-type feet-up work. But they're far too narrow, and you miss the extra leverage and control you get with normal wide off-road bars. The tyres have too little grip and the brakes are too fierce for good off-road control, as I found out when locking up the front wheel and dropping the thing at about 5mph. Damage? Indicators and lever scraped, and a chromed silencer cover broken (it's plastic, not metal as we first thought). More damage to the rider, in fact..

Conclusion
It must be said that the SLR is one of the least inspiring bikes we've ridden, and yet it isn't a bad bike, it's just not all that good...

The problems appear to stem mainly from an identity crisis - Honda have tried to take the Super Motard idea and sanitise it for everyone's consumption. Unfortunately this process has removed all the character and features which make the concept so attractive in the first place. Take a look at the KTM Duke, or the Gilera Nordwest for great examples of how to do it - these bikes have become more specialised rather than more generalised, and are better for it.

The Honda's tyres aren't up to dirt use, yet lack grip on the road. The 19 inch wheel upsets the steering, but isn't small enough to use 17 inch sticky rubber. The brakes are fine, but the suspension isn't up to heavy braking and doesn't inspire fast cornering.

What you end up with is a reliable, commuter-orientated bike almost totally devoid of character. No doubt it'll last for years (Hondas always do) and always look reasonable (though the blueing on the Brembo front master cylinder is worrying after 1300 miles) but I can't imagine anyone having a love affair with an SLR650. Give me the Dominator anytime.

Engine: Air-cooled 4-stroke RFVC SOHC single
Bore x Stroke: 100 x 82mm
Displacement: 644cm3
Compression Ratio: 8.3:1
Carburettor: 40mm VE-type
Max. Power Output: 39.4PS/5,750rpm (DIN) (29kW/5,750rpm)
Max. Torque: 5.5kg-m/4,500rpm (DIN) (54Nm/4,500rpm)
Ignition: Fully transistorised electronic
Starter: Electric
Transmission: 5-speed
Final Drive: 'O'-ring sealed chain
Dimensions: (LxWxH)2,185 x 765 x 1,140mm
Wheelbase: 1,440mm
Seat Height: 845mm
Ground Clearance: 200mm
Fuel Capacity: 13 litres
WheelsFront/Rear: Aluminium rim/Tangentially Located (TL) spoke
Tyres:

Front - 100/90-19 54S
Rear - 120/90-17 64S
Suspension:
Front - 41mm leading-axle telescopic fork, 190mm axle travel
Rear - Pro-Link, 170mm axle travel
Brakes:
Front - 276mm single hydraulic disc with dual-piston calliper and sintered metal pads
Rear - Rear - 220mm hydraulic disc with single-piston calliper and asbestos-free resin mould pads
Dry Weight: 161kg


*****
Owned for more than 5 years.
http://www.bikenet.com

Adverts Currently On Preloved - Place an ad here for free


FOR SALE
Honda SLR650
Bromsgrove, Worcs., UK
 
 
[More honda slr650 ads...]

Preloved Visitor
Reviewed December 2003.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

I like this motorbike. It´s very good at the trafficligts. When the road is slippery you can make nice big hangouts in the curvs. :) Good att small roads in the wood but not to bumpy... The best thing is the "M - [Nm]" from 0 to 60km/h it feels nice.

/Sweden


*****
Owned for 2 years.

Preloved Visitor
Reviewed November 2002.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

POOR FINISH ON ENGINE CASES BUT HAS HONDA RELIABILITY INSIDE.STARTS 1ST TIME ,EVERY TIME .EASY TO RUN ;INSURE ETCEXCELLENT AROUND TOWN ,GOOD SUSPENSION /BRAKES FOR COUNTRY ROADS . AKRONT ALLOY RIMS -GOOD KIT

*****
Owned for 2 years.

Preloved Visitor
Reviewed August 2002.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

[Log in to view email]

*****
Owned for 4 years.

Preloved Visitor
Reviewed June 2001.

Performance Reliability
***** *****
Parts Availability Overall Value for Money
***** *****

Picked up my T reg SLR 650 for £1700
last year with a couple of minor
scrapes on it.

Good points:
Very cheap.

Great in traffic and on twisty b
roads.

Good acceleration and does 100mph, not
bad for a 650 trial style.

Bad points:
Can be uncomfortable with two up.
Rider tends to get pushed forward
untothe upturn of the seat which cuts
off circulation around the goolies -
strange sensation when you get off but
more worrying than unpleasant.

Battery is a pig as it discharges
within three days - Optimate charger
essential.

No wind protection - wind blast
uncomfortable above 80mph.

Recommend Bridgestone trial/road
tires. standard dunops can be slippy
and do not inspire confidence. Keep
away from grit salt during winter.

Overall: a credible 650 road/trial with
a lot of bottom end punch for the price
of a 125.


*****
Owned for 1 year.

Showing reviews 1 to 14 of 14.

 

Important Note

All ratings and reviews are submitted by visitors to this web site, and represent their own personal opinion. They do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Preloved.

You use this information at your own risk. Preloved can not be held responsible for any damages or loss resulting from the use of this site. Please see our Terms and Conditions for more details.

Not a member yet?

Why not join the fun for free! Members can sell their stuff completely free of charge, have searches prioritised for their local area, and lots more.

Join for free | Member Log In